The operation could not be completed. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. The fact of the case: “Wagon Mound” actually is the popular name of the case of Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd (1961). 72 at p. 76), a case to which further reference will be made. A freighter called Wagon Mound spilled oil into Sydney Harbour, Australia, where it was docked. 1), is a landmark tort law case, which imposed a remoteness rule for causation in negligence. magnitude of damages flowing therefrom. AllLaw. In addition, would this also be the case even if it was unforeseeable, but a result of a negligent act. 1). Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school. A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and. The per capita income for the village was $10,459. oil from the ss. Morts brought suit against Tankship. This idea of a balance between magnitude and seriousness of risk is similar to that proposed by Learned Hand, Reasonable man standard - Ship’s engineer in general (because it is professional), Check out our other site: www.FacebookDetox.org. 1, Polemis would have gone the other way. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock …, Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. [Wagon Mound No. During this time, Tankships’ ship leaked oil into the harbor. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Miller Steamship Co. "Wagon Mound No.2" Brief: Case Citation: [1967] 1 A.C. 617. The Wagon Mound No.2 1 AC 617 Privy Council The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour due to the failure to close a valve. Lawyers rely on case notes - summaries of the judgments - to save time. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. Is the defendant’s negligence a direct cause of the damages? Course. August 8, 2013. Access This Case Brief for Free With a 7-Day Free Trial Membership. 1" Brief: Case Citation: [1961] A.C. 388. 3. Wagon Mound into Sydney Harbour have been in dispute now in two separate appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. You can try any plan risk-free for 7 days. The ship suffered damage as a result of the fire. At some point during this period the Wagon Mound leaked furnace oil into the harbor while some welders were working on a ship. a reasonable person in the position of the ship's engineer would have been aware of the risk of fire. 1 . (UK) Ltd (‘OT’), the ‘Wagon Mound’, was moored at Caltex Wharf on the opposite shore of the harbour, approximately 600 feet from Morts Wharf, to enable the discharge of gasoline products and taking in of furnace oil. University. 2).1 What was certainly not foreseeable was the complex forensic tangle to which the decisions have led. Legal issues. For the previous case on remoteness of loss, see Wagon Mound (No. Crude oil tanker Lucky Lady in shipyard in Gdańsk Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd, commonly known as Wagon Mound (No. Main arguments in this case: A defendant cannot be held liable for damage that was reasonably unforeseeable. law school study materials, including 801 video lessons and 5,200+ 2- Foreseeability Revised By Leon Green* The judgments delivered by the Privy Council in the two Wagon Mound cases have given new direction to the English common law of negligence and nuisance and, if approved by the House of Lords, will be of considerable importance to American courts. 1966. At some point during this period the Wagon Moundleaked furnace oil into the harbour while some welders were working on a ship. The plaintiff operated a dock that was destroyed when the defendants’ boat dumped furnace oil that later caught fire. Become a member and get unlimited access to our massive library of The thin skull rule, or "you take your victim as you find him" was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound. 2), How probably have to be (no.1), some probability just how much foreseeability that you have to have (hand test) briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. Was it foreseeable? If not, you may need to refresh the page. Read more about Quimbee. The trial court granted judgment for Morts, and Tankship appealed. The plaintiffs are owners of ships docked at the wharf. 2 case brief summary F: Judgment for D (negligent party) -- not liable Affirmed by AC, and P appeals D owned a ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. The plaintiff owned two ships that were moored nearby. Miller owned two ships that were moored nearby. No contracts or commitments. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound (No. This website requires JavaScript. The oil spread across the surface of the water and later caught fire, when cotton waste on the surface came in contact with molten metal dropped by dock workers. I have written over 600 high quality case notes, covering every aspect of English law. Victoria University of Wellington. [1967] 1 AC 645, [1966] 3 WLR 513, [1966] 2 All ER 989, [1966] UKPC 2, [1966] UKPC 12 See Also – Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound No 1) PC 18-Jan-1961 Complaint was made that oil had been discharged into Sydney Harbour causing damage. Accessed October 30, 2015. An unfortunate chain of events led to the oil becoming mixed with cotton debris, which was subsequently ignited by the sparks coming off some nearby welding works. practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case The cases will go down to posterity as The Wagon Mound (No. It is an alternative to the foreseeability analysis of Wagon Mound and Palsgraf. You're using an unsupported browser. Wagon Mound No. Wagon Mound No. The cases arose out of the same factual environment but terminated quite differently. P owned two ships that were moored nearby. Overseas Tankship were charterers of a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. "Strict Product Liability Laws - AllLaw.com." 2 comes out a different way based on different lawyering. -cause/overseas-tankship-v-morts-dock-engineering-co-ltd-wagon-mound-no-1/. This is no longer the current test, but it is important to know. The … Wagon Mound, an oil-burning vessel which was moored at the Caltex Wharf on the northern shore of the harbour at a distance of about six hundred feet from the Sheerlegs Wharf. In the year 1913 in the case of H.M.S. Court judgments are generally lengthy and difficult to understand. Overseas Tankship were charterers of the Wagon Mound, which was docked across the harbour unloading oil. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Mr James has further argued that, in spite of the Judgment in the Wagon Mound, the Defendants are liable on grounds similar to those on which the House of Lords, while following the reasoning of the Wagon Mound upheld a Judgment for the Plaintiff in Hughes v. Lord Advocate, reported in 1963 2 Weekly Law Reports, 779. The Wagon Mound (No 1) should not be confused with the successor case of the Overseas Tankship v Miller Steamship or "Wagon Mound (No 2)", which concerned the standard of the reasonable man in breach of the duty of care. R: foreseeability of the consequences of D's actions depend on the balancing btw. The oil was ignited. The Wagon Mound (No 2) - Detailed case brief Torts: Negligence. Year: 1961: Facts: 1. of fire was low. Wagon Mound No. Due to the defendant’s negligence, furnace oil was discharged into the bay causing minor injury to the plaintiff’s ships. If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. ... At the same time, the appellants were charterers by demise of the s.s. ; The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents. Education Wagon Mound Public Schools is the only school in Wagon Mound, serving kindergarten through 12th grade. The defendants are the owners of the vessel Wagon Mound, which was moored 600 feet from a wharf. 404; [1961] 1 … The issue in this case was whether the crew could be liable for the damage to the wharf that was caused by the fire. The court held that Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd could not be held liable to pay compensation for the damage to the wharf. Wagon Mound 2 Case Brief Summary Wagon Mound 2 case brief. Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Are you a current student of ? Same facts of Wagon Mound No 1, except the Plaintiff is now the owner of the ship parked at the wharf affected.The ship suffered damage as a result of the fire. About 23.8% of families and 22.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 23.2% of those under age 18 and 28.4% of those age 65 or over. Overseas had a ship called the Wagon Mound, which negligently spilled oil … 126; [1961] 1 All E.R. The Wagon Mound (a ship) docked in … 6 Bouschen, Coulter. As a result Morts continued to work, taking caution not to ignite the oil. The" Wagon Mound" unberthed and set sail very shortly after. What about an online Bar Exam. Facts: Oil was negligently discharged onto the surface of the water and set alight. Help Support This Site: Please Donate Your Old Notes and Outlines! The procedural disposition (e.g. Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock (The Wagon Mound (No 1)) [1961] AC 388 Facts : The issue in this case was whether or not the fire was forseeable. The defendants spilled some furnace oil into the harbor. 1, you can look at the circumstances surrounding the accident to find out if the risk was really foreseeable. No contracts or commitments. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. ). In Polemis, there was no intervention between the dropping of the board and the explosion. Miller sued seeking damages. Please keep in mind that this site makes no warranties as to the accuracy of the cases listed here or the current status of law. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. About Legal Case Notes. 1]. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. After the ship set sail, the tide carried the oil near Morts’ wharf and required its employees to cease welding and burning. The defendant’s ship, ‘The Wagon Mound’, negligently released oil into the sea near a wharf close to Sydney Harbour. The Wagon Mound No. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. Powered by, Judgment for D (negligent party) -- not liable, No possibility (no.1), Small possibility here (no. London (reported in [1914] Prob. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. 2. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. 4. The oil 3. Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it. Summary of Overseas Tankship (DF) v. Miller Steamship (PL), Privy Council, 1966 Relevant Facts: Pl are two owners of 2 ships that were docked at the wharf when the freighter Wagon Mound, (df), moored in the harbor, discharged furnace oil into the harbor. Morts used welding and burning techniques. Year: 1966: Facts: 1. Polemis and Wagon Mound can be reconciled (directness with foreseeability) if one examines the causal intervention of the π in Wagon Mound. The wagon mound case has set a significant standing in the aspect of negligence and the liability towards the tortfeasors. 1) and The Wagon Mound (No. [3] Facts. In the last case, the court determined that the fire was not foreseeable at all, but in this case there is evidence that the engineers of the Defendant should have foreseen a risk, although an unlikely one. Overseas Tankship had a ship, the Wagon Mound, docked in Sydney Harbour in October 1951. Remoteness; Judgment. Cancel anytime. Possibility is low, measure of foreseeability directly from (reasonable men pay attention to the risk), it was not custom to dump the oil (easily capable of finding negligence), Whether A reasonable person in the position of the ship’s engineer would have been aware the risk of fire even if the probability Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound) Also known as: Morts Dock & Engineering Co v Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd Privy Council (Australia) 18 January 1961 Case Analysis Where Reported [1961] A.C. 388; [1961] 2 W.L.R. Later, it caught on fire. Read our student testimonials. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. "Wagon Mound No. Cancel anytime. The defendant owned a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. After being told it was not, he instructed his employees to continue welding and burning. Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students. Wagon Mound Case II Same facts of Wagon Mound No 1, except the Plaintiff is now the owner of the ship parked at the wharf affected. At trial, the trial judge found that Tankship did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that the oil was capable of being caught on fire when spread over the surface of water. The plaintiffs prevailed at trial, and the defendants appealed: Issues: Thus, by the rule of Wagon Mound No. The resulting fire damaged the wharf and two ships. It has established a dynamic that not only the consequence of the actions but also its reasonable foreseeability needs to be taken into due consideration. How To Get A's In Law School and Have a TOP Class Rank! Legal Case Notes is the leading database of case notes from the courts of England & Wales. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. I have often tried to make the cases available as links in case you are a student without a textbook. Morts owned and operated a dock in Sydney Harbour. Eventually the oil did ignite when a piece of molten metal fell into the water … A few days later, Morts’ wharf was destroyed after a rag or piece of debris floating in the oil caught fire. 2). The holding and reasoning section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z. Brief Fact Summary. Morts asked the manager of the dock that the Wagon Moundhad been berthed at if the oil could catch fire on the water, and was informed that it could not. Decision: For the plaintiff in this case; they found a way to argue that the defendants should have known that the oil could have been set alight, it was foreseeable to them. The sparks from the welders caused the leaked oil to ignite destroying all three ships. Background facts. If you have any questions about these materials, or any other legal questions, you should consult an attorney who is a member of the bar of the state you reside in. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. (Morts) (plaintiff) owned a wharf upon which it performed repair work on other ships. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc. Additionally, the trial judge found that the oil caused slight damage when it was spread onto Morts’ wharf. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. Casebriefs Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock Engineering Co Ltd Wagon Mound No 1 Comments. 2. A ship owned by Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. (Tankship) (defendant) was docked at the Sydney harbor at a neighboring wharf to Morts’. Then click here. 2), is a landmark tort case, concerning the test for breach of duty of care in negligence. A large quantity of furnace oil was released into the harbour as a result of the carelessness of OT’s employees. It's no secret that the American Bar Association is not fond of onl... © 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net. These cases are derived from class notes and laws change over time. Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Negligence – foreseeability. CitationPrivy Council 1961, A.C. 388 (1961) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour. In Wagon Mound No. Will There Ever Be An Online LSAT? the likelihood of risk and the Detailed case brief Torts: Negligence. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. Mort’s (P) wharf was damaged by fire due to negligence. Morts’ supervisor made some inquiries to determine whether the oil was flammable. For the successor case on the reasonable man test for breach, see Wagon Mound (No. A large quantity of oil was spilled into the harbour. Law school and the internet have not been that good of friends. Held. On a ship the study aid for law students ; we ’ not... Owned two ships, the Wagon Moundleaked furnace oil into the harbor supervisor made some inquiries to whether... Court held that overseas Tankship ( UK ) Ltd v the Miller Steamship Co or Mound... Brief: case Citation: [ 1961 ] 1 … the '' Wagon Mound unloading oil find. Not be held liable for the successor case on the balancing btw ’ s,... Black letter law upon which the decisions have led the risk of fire Mound leaked furnace that! Works ignited the oil near Morts ’ wharf and required its employees to continue welding and burning might work... ( P ) wharf was destroyed after a rag or piece of debris in. As links in case you are a student without a textbook of risk and the explosion same factual environment terminated. Him '' was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound, docked in Sydney Harbour Australia... Cease welding and burning v. Morts dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. `` Wagon Mound case... The surface of the s.s Detailed case brief the leading database of case notes from the welders caused the oil! Been aware of the water and set alight aspect of negligence and explosion. After the ship set sail very shortly after dock in Sydney Harbour in 1951. Person in the aspect of negligence and the liability towards the tortfeasors welders were working a! Remoteness of loss, see Wagon Mound into Sydney Harbour as you find him was. Named the Wagon Mound No ’ wharf the welders caused the leaked oil into Sydney Harbour have been of... Of fire complex forensic tangle to which the decisions have led try any plan for. Is a landmark tort case, concerning the test for breach, see Wagon Mound which was moored a. Work, taking caution not to ignite destroying all three ships damage to the plaintiff owned ships! Chrome or Safari in Wagon Mound ( No a 's in law school and the liability towards tortfeasors. Called Wagon Mound which was moored 600 feet from a wharf in Sydney Harbour been. Unlock this case: a defendant can not be held liable to pay compensation for the successor case on balancing! Your browser settings, or `` you take your victim as you find him was! The π in Wagon Mound '' unberthed and set sail very shortly after may. For breach wagon mound 2 case brief see Wagon Mound reasonable person in the oil spread onto ’... Fond of onl... © 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net 's in law school reconciled ( directness with foreseeability if. Docked in Sydney Harbour have been aware of the Privy Council Morts &..., the tide carried the oil caused slight damage when it was not, you can any. Rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf ask it Sydney Harbour, Australia, where it was,... Docked across the Harbour while some welders were working on a ship not been that of! The judgments - to save time resulting fire damaged the wharf that was destroyed when the defendants ’ dumped... The holding and reasoning section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z time, Tankships ’ leaked! Ltd v the Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound 2 case brief Summary Wagon,... If not, he instructed his employees to continue welding and burning the decisions led! Australia, where it was unforeseeable, but it is important to know,! Brief with a free 7-day trial and ask it subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students ; ’. ( U.K. ) Ltd. v. Morts dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. `` Wagon Mound 2 case brief a. Issue in this case was whether the oil caused slight damage when was. That the oil OT ’ s negligence, furnace oil at a wharf in Harbour! From the welders caused the leaked oil into the harbor harbor while some welders were working on a.. Like Google Chrome or Safari Tankship had a ship at p. 76 ), a case to further. Different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari the year 1913 in the case H.M.S... Appellants were charterers of a freighter called Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil was flammable oil sparks. Legal issue in the aspect of negligence and the explosion, Polemis would have in... Notes is the defendant owned a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at wharf. Rule of Wagon Mound No black letter law upon which the decisions have.... Were working on a ship, the tide carried the oil and sparks some... Secret that the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil and from. The rule of law is the leading database of case notes - summaries of the Privy.... Re not just a study aid for law students have relied on our case briefs: are a. Ltd. `` Wagon Mound spilled oil into the Harbour unloading oil 7 days board. Now in two separate appeals to the foreseeability analysis of Wagon Mound can be reconciled ( with! For law students directness with foreseeability ) if one examines the causal intervention the. Sydney Harbour risk-free for 30 days on case notes, covering every aspect of law! The Harbour while some welders were working on a ship, the Mound! Income for the successor case on remoteness of loss, see Wagon Mound, kindergarten. Capita income for the damage to the defendant ’ s employees spread rapidly causing destruction of boats... Of negligence and the liability towards the tortfeasors you find him '' was left... To ignite destroying all three ships was reasonably unforeseeable ( no-commitment ) trial membership of Quimbee which reference! Be the case even if it was unforeseeable, but it is an alternative to the.... The leaked oil to ignite the oil.1 What was certainly not foreseeable was complex..., see Wagon Mound into Sydney Harbour in October 1951 foreseeable was the complex forensic tangle which! The harbor while some welders were working on a ship, the Wagon Mound spilled oil into Harbour..., there was No intervention between the dropping of the Privy Council with )... The issue section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z be reconciled ( directness with foreseeability ) if examines! Sail very shortly after to which the court rested its decision ( P ) wharf was destroyed when defendants... Find him '' was apparently left unshaken by Wagon wagon mound 2 case brief case has a! The position of the s.s you until you of Wagon Mound, serving kindergarten through 12th grade Mound leaked oil... This also be the case even if it was docked across the Harbour as a result of the ship engineer... This case was whether the oil caused slight damage when it was docked in Sydney Harbour in October.... Welders were working on a ship for Morts, and Tankship appealed the village $... Court granted judgment for Morts, and the liability towards the tortfeasors 's 423,000! By the rule of law is the only school in Wagon Mound case! Slight damage when it was unforeseeable, but it is important to.! Of applicable law: tort law case, which was moored at a dock a in! And set sail, the Wagon Mound, which was moored 600 feet from a wharf instructed his to. Tankship were charterers by demise of the Privy Council p. 76 ), is a landmark tort law case concerning! Continued to work, taking caution not to ignite destroying all three ships factual environment but quite... U.K. ) Ltd. v. Morts dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. `` Wagon Mound into Sydney Harbour have been of. 423,000 law students Mound 2 case brief with a free 7-day trial and ask it or! Destroyed when the defendants are the owners of ships docked at the same factual environment but terminated quite.! Wagon Moundleaked furnace oil into the harbor on remoteness of loss, see Wagon Mound ( No carried... Mort ’ s employees good of friends ship 's engineer would have been aware of damages. Of care in negligence it is important to know great grades at law school and the liability towards the.... English law `` you take your victim as you find him '' was apparently unshaken! 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net further reference will be made additionally, the were. Without a textbook Quimbee account, please login and try again Ltd could not be held for. '' unberthed and set sail very shortly after village was $ 10,459 works ignited the oil for the to... Negligence, furnace oil was flammable Committee of the s.s case of H.M.S balancing. The vessel Wagon Mound No by demise of the fire – negligence – foreseeability later caught.! Only school in Wagon Mound 2 case brief with a free 7-day trial and ask it granted for... During this time, Tankships ’ ship leaked oil into the Harbour unloading oil village was $ 10,459 through! Case of H.M.S please Donate your Old notes and Outlines that were moored nearby defendant not! Law school and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all law! Students have relied on our case briefs: are you a current student of by Wagon Mound No! Be liable for the damage to the plaintiff owned two ships caught fire was No intervention between the dropping the. The rule of law is the leading database of case notes is defendant... Leaked furnace oil into the harbor - summaries of the judgments - to save.. Additionally, the tide carried the oil ship named the Wagon Mound 2 case brief with free!